News

Buzzwords in winning Race to the Top applications

The Hechinger Report is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

What does it take to win millions of federal dollars to finance state education reforms? Including some magical words certainly can’t hurt. A look at the finalists’ applications from the second round of Race to the Top reveals that winners hit on key education buzzwords more frequently than losers did. One exception is that losers mentioned “early education” more often than winners did.

(Click to enlarge)

The words “charter,” “evaluation,” “rigor” or “standards,” “assessment,” “accountability,” and “online” or “e-learning” were mentioned more often in winning applications. On average, winners included the phrases “professional development” and “data-driven” almost twice as often as losers. The terms “value-added” and “tenure” were mentioned less often, and at about the same rate by winning and losing applicants.

Not surprisingly, in order to fit in all these words, winning applications were about 20 percent longer on average. The average length for winners was 343 pages. For losers, it was 286.

The one category that losers appeared to pay more attention to was early childhood education. Losing applications mentioned the words “early childhood,” “early learning,” “early education,” “preschool,” and “pre-kindergarten” more often than winning applications.

Massachusetts, the top-ranked winner in the second round and a state generally recognized as having one of the best public education systems in the country, bucked some of these trends. The state didn’t mention “value-added” at all, and included the term “data-driven” only once. It did, however, mention early childhood a little more often than most states did.

California wrote about “standards” and “rigor” a staggering 755 times in its application – to no avail, apparently, since it didn’t make the winners’ circle. Louisiana, which lost, and Ohio, which won, included “value-added” more than 100 times in their applications, a much higher frequency than in other states’ submissions. Ohio also appeared to be the most enthusiastic about charters, a term that showed up more than 400 times in its 383-page application.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn't mean it's free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.
All donations doubled through the end of the year.

Join us today.

Letters

Sarah Garland

Sarah Garland is the executive editor of The Hechinger Report. She started out in journalism reporting on murders and mayhem in New York City for… See Archive

Sarah Butrymowicz

Sarah Butrymowicz is senior editor for investigations. For her first four years at The Hechinger Report, she was a staff writer, covering k-12 education, traveling… See Archive

Letters to the Editor

Send us your thoughts

At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information.

By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.





No letters have been published at this time.