The Hechinger Report is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

Credit: Image: © Sascha Steinach/DPA via ZUMA Press)

Students who have outstanding balances that prevent them from finishing college are often short just a few dollars and a couple of credits.

Even unpaid library fines and balances on campus cards can trigger a windfall of consequences that push thousands of students into debt and degree-less purgatory every year.

Amid an increased focus on these students, the University Innovation Alliance recently announced a round of so-called completion grants for students from low-income backgrounds who are close to graduating. This group of 11 large public universities says individual payment shortfalls of $1,000 or less put 4,000 of its Pell-eligible seniors at risk of dropping out. The Alliance says it drew its inspiration from the Panther Retention Grants program that Georgia State University started in 2011, when 1,000 students were dropping out every semester because of unpaid tuition of less than $1,500 each. Georgia State says the program has helped 8,000 students since 2011. (Funders for the UIA completion grants include the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which is also a funder of The Hechinger Report.)

While they are certainly helpful, these grants are not enough; they tackle a symptom without solving the underlying problem.

Related: DEBT WITHOUT DEGREE: Students drown in debt despite a $524 million state surplus

That problem is the failed leverage and collections policies that disproportionately inhibit low-income students from finishing college, transferring their credits and re-enrolling after stopping out.

“When colleges prioritize their financial interests over their public mission, everyone loses.”

Until colleges and universities are willing to rethink these policies, they will perpetuate cycles of poverty for affected students.

Colleges function as both businesses with private financial interests and institutions with a shared public mission. As surely as colleges will increase tuition to cover operational costs and give more aid to support students, these natures are always in competition.

In the current higher education landscape — one where disinvestment and falling enrollment is driving colleges to compete with their peers in new and increasingly controversial ways — institutions are under more pressure than ever to prioritize business over student success. And while they’re pushing for new, innovative solutions to old problems, they may be paying less attention to how some of their most problematic policies ensure their bottom lines at the cost of student success.

Colleges go to great lengths to collect on what they are owed and protect themselves from potential loss of revenue. Some collection policies, like sending outstanding student account balances to collection agencies, are encouraged or facilitated by state law. Others are common institutional practices, like that of holding transcripts hostage as leverage.

Related: DEBT WITHOUT DEGREE: The human cost of college debt that becomes “purgatory”

Together, these policies can lock students from low-income backgrounds in college debt purgatory. Consider the example of a student from a low-income family whose parent becomes sick, forcing him to divert tuition money home and leaving him with an outstanding account balance.

That student might be barred from registering for courses until the balance is paid down. Worse, he might also be denied access to his transcript, which means now he can’t transfer his earned credits to a cheaper institution to finish his degree program.

Without a credential, this student winds up locked into low-paying jobs to repay the loans he took on to finance a degree he now can’t earn and his outstanding balance, on top of his usual living costs.

Related: DEBT WITHOUT DEGREE: Gaps in financial aid, funding contribute to growing number of Georgians with college loans and no college degree

If the student wants to return to school, he’ll have to prioritize repaying those federal and institutional loans. Defaulting on either could lead to the original college refusing to re-enroll the student. He could enroll in an income-driven repayment plan for his federal loans, a complicated enough pursuit on its own; the college could still pass his outstanding balance to a collection agency in the meantime, damaging his credit and further diminishing his prospects for returning to school.

Even if the student managed to do everything right and put money toward his outstanding balance each month, he’d need to pay it off in short order. That’s because it’s common practice for colleges to delete student records and the student’s earned credits after a certain amount of time.

And to what end? Blocking students from registering for courses and re-enrolling means potentially blocking revenue, and students who don’t finish their degrees are more than three times as likely to default on their loans, which (in large numbers) can put the colleges they attended at risk of losing access to federal student aid. And how many colleges are paying for administrators and programs solely dedicated to increasing retention with one possible solution right in front of them? Colleges should reevaluate collections policies their consequences for themselves as well as students.

When colleges prioritize their financial interests over their public mission, everyone loses. Completion grants are a necessary step towards righting the ship, but putting student success first will require colleges to own up to the idea that they have even more control over the financial circumstances and status of their students than their actions suggest.

This story was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for our newsletter.

Ernest Ezeugo is a program assistant for the Education Policy program at New America, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, D.C.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn't mean it's free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.

Letters to the Editor

At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information. We will not consider letters that do not contain a full name and valid email address. You may submit news tips or ideas here without a full name, but not letters.

By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email address. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *