The Hechinger Report is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

campus protest
Jonathan Butler, front left, addresses a crowd following the announcement that University of Missouri System President Tim Wolfe would resign Monday, Nov. 9, 2015, at the university in Columbia, Mo. Credit: AP Photo/Jeff Roberson

“Crybullies,” “entitled whiner syndrome,” “spoiled sense of entitlement … ”

Since the start of the student protests on the University of Missouri campus that included a hunger strike by a graduate student and a sit-out by the Tigers’ football team, negative, demeaning and offensive comments have been hurled at student participants.

It is as if folks assume that being enrolled in college or university is such a privilege that one parks one’s capacity to criticize at the door.

Is the concept of students speaking up and out, asking for racial equality and harmony or improvements to the institution they attend verboten today?

Related: Amid national diversity protests, community college students dare to dream of debt-free life

Stated differently, it strikes me that what folks are saying is: be quiet and thankful and go about your own life. It is rude and disrespectful, the argument goes, to get angry and exercised when one is fortunate enough (privileged enough) to be a college student, earning a degree and pursuing a pathway to future economic success.

“It is as if folks assume that being enrolled in college or university is such a privilege that one parks one’s capacity to criticize at the door.”

The criticism of the Mizzou graduate student who went on a hunger strike has been wicked – pointing out that he comes from family wealth. Did his privilege mean he is barred from protesting or challenging authority? Do we really expect or want students to be “tame” and “compliant” and “respectful” even in the face of events, conduct and actions that are offensive, culturally inappropriate and racially insensitive – both in reality and as perceived? And, if the students perceive affronts that others of us do not perceive similarly, are we so sure our reactions are right? Who judges what is offensive?

I have been equally disquieted by many of the comments surrounding the more recent defacing of portraits of African American faculty at Harvard Law School. Instead of outrage, some commentators have been downright calm while others have suggested that the minority students at the institution are responsible in an effort to create added evidence of racism at Harvard Law School. Seriously?

Related: Yale students break through generations of pained black silence

As a product of the 60’s – when many protests turned sadly into violence and were accompanied by arrests – I have been disappointed by the absence of student protests over the past decades. Students need to learn to fight for what is right and fair and just, most especially those in positions of privilege whether of their own making or inherited. The alternative – silence in the face of wrongs – has a long and horrific history, of which the Holocaust is but one example.

I refuse to believe that our campuses are such paradigms of racial, ethnic and gender equality that we can afford to just “go along” calmly and without dissent. Anyone who has been on any campus knows there are inequities of all sorts. Just look and listen to the students of all ages, races, ethnicities and genders.

If we want a world in which we treat all people with decency, let’s not strip our students of their capacity to protest. Privilege does not demand that. Students can shout and levy charges; they can peacefully demonstrate; they can get angry over inequities. In fact, the two lessons referenced above tell me that students in college today are privileged (each in different ways to be sure) and with that privilege comes enormous responsibility to lead the charge for a better world. As educators, we can and should ask our students to use their “privilege” positively.

Related: Surprised that college football players tackled bigotry on campus? Here’s why you shouldn’t be

When I became a college president, I was fortunate to spend time with one of the college’s major donors. Once, after I thanked her for her remarkable generosity, she turned to me and said: “Remember, I did not earn all this money; I inherited it. But, my parents always reminded me that with this wealth comes equally if not larger responsibilities and obligations to give back to others in ways that have meaning.”

Her words have also stayed with me; they have informed how I reflect on my own money and asking for donations. They have guided me as I reflect on the deep duty that accompanies (or at least should accompany) privilege for those with abundant resources. These are important lessons.

Folks, in the recent peaceful incidents on America’s campuses, the students are not whining; they are not being disrespectful; they are not being selfish. No, they are doing precisely with what we need for them to do with their privilege: improve the world we all inhabit and promote a brighter and better world for their children and our grandchildren to inherit.

That is, and should be, the obligation and responsibility of privilege.

Karen Gross is the former president of Southern Vermont College and former senior policy advisor for the U.S. Department of Education. She is currently senior counsel at Widmeyer Communications.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn't mean it's free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.

Letters to the Editor

At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information. We will not consider letters that do not contain a full name and valid email address. You may submit news tips or ideas here without a full name, but not letters.

By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email address. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *