Future of Learning

Should computer-assisted teaching expand its reach to more states?

Classroom volunteer Aimee Menne helps teach one of the only computer science classes currently offered at San Francisco’s Mission High.

The nation’s second-smallest state joins the growing list of those who expect technology to play a starring role in efforts to improve schools for students.

Last week, leaders from Delaware’s education, nonprofit and business communities released a new statewide plan for its public school system. The blueprint, called Student Success 2025, included personalized learning as one of the key strategies.

What is personalized learning? (Skip ahead to the next paragraph if you know the answer to that question.) Generally speaking, a personalized learning path is tailored to the needs of the student and gives the student a measure of control over the pace or style of instruction. Blended learning, which is commonly described as computer-assisted, in-person teaching, can be used to achieve personalized learning.

Sign up for our Blended Learning newsletter



Rhode Island, Colorado and Ohio are among the states that are receiving nonprofit support, both financial and technical, to expand the reach of technology in public schools. Ohio, for example, is using investments from advocacy groups to accelerate the adoption of technology by training teachers. Individual teachers and principals played an important role in testing these new teaching strategies, before statewide leaders and national advocacy groups began investing in projects.

The same is happening in Delaware: Education technology’s adoption has been growing organically, and now leaders want to put some extra fertilizer on it. They asked community members, teachers, students and others to help them design a plan to make it reality.

I spoke with Superintendent Susan Bunting, who leads the Indian River School District in southern Delaware. The district has a large number of students from low-income families and homes where English is not the primary language. Here are excerpts from my conversation with Bunting.

Q: I understand personalized learning is a pretty big part of the state’s new Student Success 2025 plan. What do you think of it, and why do you think that’s part of the plan?

A: We’ve been involved with [a project to increase cooperation across school district boundaries in Delaware], and we saw the potential of personalized learning four years ago. I think it’s the wave of the future. It allows us to maximize each child’s potential and really deal with each child’s abilities and challenges in a way we’ve never been able to before. I am quite excited about it.

Q: How did you see personalized learning evolve?

A: For us, it began with the knowledge that technology can enhance learning. And we had the opportunity to begin to explore using it on many systems and platforms. We began training our teachers on the use of Schoology, which was selected by the state as a platform. The teachers were taught how to use it and how to design lessons that could make such a difference. The blended learning piece has been really enthusiastically embraced.

Q: How does personalized learning fit into the broader plan for improving the state’s schools?

A: This is the wave of the future. This is the way it has to be. In 10 years we are going to see – particularly high schools – look very different from what we know them as today. You might have two students, for example, who want to learn Japanese, and you can do that through technology. It just broadens the all the opportunities for our students.

Q: What do you think are some of the challenges to bringing personalized learning to more students?

A: Money – paying for it. And changing the way people think about school. There are traditionalists who haven’t yet embraced that idea that the world is going to be very different. For example, for so many years we’ve judged education on “you’ve completed a semester of this” or “you spent a marking period studying a subject.” The idea that you might be able to demonstrate

mastery on a certain subject, get credit for that, and then move on to something else, it’s just going to require people to rethink everything we’ve done. It’s just not the mental framework we have for schools.

This interview was conducted for our free Blended Learning newsletter. Subscribe today to receive the week’s news about educational technology and blended learning delivered to your inbox every Tuesday. Sign up for a free subscription, and invite a friend to subscribe.

Letters

Nichole Dobo

Nichole Dobo is the senior engagement editor and a writer. Her work has been published in the Los Angeles Times, The Atlantic's online edition, Mind/Shift,… See Archive

Letters to the Editor

Send us your thoughts

At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information.

By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.





No letters have been published at this time.