A proposal from the White House: $4 billion for computer science education for every K-12 student

The White House wants to bring computer science to every student, and this past weekend President Obama proposed spending more than $4 billion on a new federal program to make that reality.

Too few students take computer science Advanced Placement courses, federal officials said in a conference call with reporters last Friday, and too few teachers are prepared to instruct these classes. And 22 states do not allow students to count computer science toward a diploma, according to officials in the U.S. Department of Education, even as nine out of 10 parents in a Gallup poll reported that they want their children to take these courses.

Even with the backing of the president, an ambitious-sounding title (“Computer Science for All”) and a multi-billion-dollar price tag, the White House’s plan isn’t guaranteed to succeed. First, and most practically, it’s just a proposal. Congress would have to want to spend this money as much as the White House does. And even if Congress were to agree on a plan and approve it, an important question remains. What’s the best way to do it?

Sign up for our Blended Learning newsletter



Some might think technology could provide a quick fix: Just put computer science courses online and encourage people to take them. But these online classes, most of them free, are already widely available and have been for years. Students can take any number of them, including some taught by Ivy League professors. Simply offering high quality, free information doesn’t mean people will avail themselves of it. (Ask any public librarian.)

Also, research suggests that online learning alone, while it can be valuable, is not effective for every student.

A mix of technology and in-person instruction might help make computer science available to more students, if – and this is a big ‘if’ – schools can hire and train the right teachers. The problem is unlikely to be solved without extraordinary cooperation among teachers, state leaders, the federal government and the technology community. This isn’t a job for the robots.

This story was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Read more about blended learning.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn't mean it's free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.

Letters

Nichole Dobo

Nichole Dobo is the senior engagement editor and a writer. Her work has been published in the Los Angeles Times, The Atlantic's online edition, Mind/Shift,… See Archive

Letters to the Editor

Send us your thoughts

At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information.

By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.





No letters have been published at this time.