The Hechinger Report is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

Before she was appointed U.S. Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos was one of the wealthiest advocates of the charter school and school choice movement in the country. After assuming her role in the Trump Administration, she became one of the most powerful. At her 2017 Senate confirmation hearing, DeVos began by asking the senators, “Why in 2017 are we still questioning parents’ ability to exercise educational choice for their children?”

The school choice movement is, ostensibly, about giving parents the ability to use state and federal dollars to choose other schools – private, parochial, charter, even online schools – if they feel their local public school isn’t doing a good job. In the United States, 90 percent of students  go to public schools, usually schools assigned to them based on where they live.

In Devos’ model of school choice, students would receive vouchers, or a set amount of federal dollars, that would follow them to whatever school they choose. But critics say this system would create inequity, and allow federal dollars to go to private and religious institutions. And it might not help students do better. Research in Indiana, Louisiana and Ohio has shown that students who use vouchers to attend charters and private schools in those states are performing worse on standardized tests than students in public schools.

All of this talk of DeVos expanding school choice nationally, and what the impact would be, got Sarah Butrymowicz thinking: “If [DeVos] were given sort of unfettered ability to do whatever she wanted to the U.S. school system, what would it look like?”

Sarah is senior investigations editor at The Hechinger Report.

To find out, she went to three countries where school choice is part of the national education model: New Zealand, Sweden and France. Sarah wanted to know if students were performing better there, and if the schools were less segregated by race and class than they are in the United States.

“These arguments about school choice in the United States, they don’t have to be purely hypothetical, purely theoretical,” she says. “We can look at other countries, and the messy complicating factors that get in the way of this ideal version of school choice that some people talk about.”

Listen to the Educate podcast to hear what Sarah discovered about how school choice is working abroad.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn't mean it's free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.

Letters to the Editor

At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information. We will not consider letters that do not contain a full name and valid email address. You may submit news tips or ideas here without a full name, but not letters.

By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email address. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *