The Hechinger Report is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

Davis Jenkins
Davis Jenkins

There’s a reason so many students in U.S. community colleges don’t finish: Not enough enter a specific, college-level program, according to Davis Jenkins, who has over 25 years of experience as a researcher, evaluator, consultant and program manager on projects related to education and employment in the U.S. and abroad. The Hechinger Report spoke with Davis, a senior researcher at the Community College Research Center at Teachers College, Columbia University, on the eve of the second anniversary of President Barack Obama’s American Graduation Initiative.

Your recent research points to a major reason why most students who enter higher education through a community college fail to earn a postsecondary credential. You also offer some potential solutions. What must community colleges do to get more students to graduate?

We have to think about how to take students without clear goals and knowledge of college and guide them to enter programs that are well-structured and lead to something. A key thing that our research—and other research—points to is that most students who enter community colleges don’t even get into a program, either because they are stuck in remedial education or they drop out. Those who enter a coherent program early on [like marketing, nursing or criminal justice] do better. You have to provide a clear pathway built into the curriculum … you have to lay out the pathways. The big issue is incentives and support. Community colleges should require student-success courses.

The innovative institutions really understand you can’t let students navigate themselves through college. A lot of community-college students have no idea what to do. And they aren’t spending enough time and focusing on rethinking what they do. We think it’s beneficial to help students chose a program of study and support them through it.

On the eve of the second anniversary of President Barack Obama’s American Graduation Initiative, The Hechinger Report found countless obstacles in the way of meeting the ambitious goal of restoring the U.S. to first place by 2020 in the proportion of 25- to 34-year-olds with college degrees. Do these findings surprise you?

The problem is, there were zero financial incentives. The bigger package that President Obama wanted had a lot of provisions to work with states and to create these kinds of policy incentives to focus on outcomes. But if creating more structures to align students is the answer, community colleges have almost no financial incentive. They are under-resourced, and with the flood of students and displaced workers who want to retrain, they don’t have much time. Students can’t spend a lot of time earning a degree. They need something that leads to a certificate, but many of them have been out of the workplace and need at least a brush-up in math … and it has to be done very quickly. The question is how to provide incentives. I see the community-college movement trying to do it, but not only are budgets getting cut, there is a policy mindset lumping them together with four-year universities. They have their own issues and they can’t be treated the same way.

Piecemeal efforts, even those at a fairly large scale, aren’t going to move the needle. I’m talking about really rethinking, about a systemic change in rethinking what colleges do. If they take a look at what they do, they will realize quickly they aren’t doing enough to guide study. The community-college movement is trying to serve its communities. We need more students with more postsecondary training, so community colleges are trying to adapt to that. They have to help students think about their goals, or what it takes if they want to transfer to the state university. They need to look at their own programs and make sure they do indeed lead somewhere. If it’s a certificate, it should be linked to a program. If it’s an associate degree, it should clearly be linked to a bachelor’s degree.

Why is it so critical that we get more Americans to complete degrees? There are plenty of people arguing that doing so isn’t necessary.

You can’t get a decent job anymore that pays a living wage without some postsecondary training, and now so many of the unemployed may have credentials. If you don’t have one, you are competing against someone who does. A high-school diploma doesn’t mean anything. A degree at least shows motivation and a basic level of literacy—and, ideally, some real skills.

This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn't mean it's free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.

Letters to the Editor

1 Letter

At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information. We will not consider letters that do not contain a full name and valid email address. You may submit news tips or ideas here without a full name, but not letters.

By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email address. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.

  1. Good article I’ve been trying to get my aa in administration of justice for 7 years hopefully I’ll get it this fall. Do you think a program with goals of helping students with 12 or less credits to go should be mandatory, Mr Jenkins?

Submit a letter

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *