The Hechinger Report is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

Now that spring is finally here, kids cooped up during this particularly brutal winter might be looking forward to enjoying some sunshine. Many will have to control the wiggles a little longer, though. It’s standardized testing season, which means silent hallways, desks arranged in rows, and for many kids, a lot of anxiety until it’s over.

Now that the tests in many states are getting harder in order to align with the new Common Core standards and being used to grade teachers, not just students, they’re also producing a lot of anxiety among parents and teachers, too. In response to the added pressure this year, a movement against standardized testing is gathering steam as some parents decide to let their children opt out of the tests.

Their movement may not stop the use of the tests. But it does raise the question of whether the resisters have a point.

standardized tests pros and cons
Photo by Biology Corner

The Hechinger Report asked parents who are pulling their kids out of the tests to explain the reasons they did so. And then we asked Sandi Jacobs, vice president of the National Council on Teacher Quality, which supports the use of standardized tests to evaluate teachers, to make an argument for why kids shouldn’t opt out of tests.

Here’s what parents in favor of opting out said:

1) The tests don’t actually measure the skills we want students to learn, such as critical thinking, creativity and complex problem solving. Latoshia Wheeler, a work-at-home mom of three, has led an opt-out movement at her third grader’s school, the Riverdale Avenue Community School in Brownsville, a low-income neighborhood in Brooklyn. Ninety percent of the students receive free lunch, a measure of poverty, and 94 percent are black or Hispanic. Wheeler estimates only two or three students will take the tests this year in the third grade. The rest have opted out.

Instead of multiple-choice exams, Wheeler says she wishes the state tests could be modeled on the portfolios of class work and projects her high school-age daughter turns in twice a year. “That teaches them how to express themselves. They can see where they grew,” she said. “That’s more on the lines of critical thinking. That makes you want to do better, and I just feel like kids learn more from experience.”

2) The tests aren’t reliable measures of how much students know and how well teachers can teach. Liz Rosenberg is the parent of a fourth grader at the Brooklyn New School, a school with a sizeable middle and upper middle class population. A group of New School parents announced on Tuesday that 80 percent of students in testing grades were opting out of the tests this year. “There’s very little reason to have faith in the tests,” Rosenberg, who works as a teacher trainer, said.

“All you get is one little score. You actually get no information about your child,” she added. “You get no information about what it is they do well. What it is they need to work on.”

3) Schools spend too much time prepping for mediocre, unreliable exams, especially at struggling schools where students could benefit from more enrichment. Wheeler says her son’s school does not offer art or music to students, and that they rarely go on field trips. She says the focus on the math and English tests also takes away time from the other core subjects of science and of social studies.

“All they do is teach them to take a test. You should teach a child to learn,” she said. “There’s so much that’s missing.”

Although many educators and officials admit the tests aren’t perfect, in New York, state and city education officials have urged families like the Rosenbergs and the Wheelers not to opt out. We asked Jacobs why students should stick with the exams.

1) The tests are about to get better, now that Common Core aligned tests are rolling out next year in many states. The new tests will have problems that ask students to do more than pick an answer from a list of four choices. For instance, the English tests developed by two testing consortia include questions that may ask students to pick more than one answer or ask them to highlight important points in a text. They also include short essay questions. The new math tests in some cases allow students to write out formulas or manipulate shapes on a computer screen.

But Jacobs said one reason many parents are frustrated is that the tests haven’t caught up with the new standards being taught in schools yet. “There’s a very valid concern that they’re not well aligned with the standards that are in place,” she said. “That should change in the very near future. I think that frustration is real, at the same time, it’s part of the process.”

2) The tests may not reveal everything about how much a student has learned, but they’re an important element of a more holistic picture of student performance. Proponents of the tests, and of the teacher evaluations now attached to them, usually argue that the tests should be one piece of an evaluation of student performance that includes formative tests, too, and that teachers should also be graded on classroom observations and lesson planning.

“The idea that assessment isn’t an important part of teaching and learning, I’m not sure how the conversation got to this point where we seemed to lost sight that anything a teacher knows about her students is because she measured it some way,” Jacobs said.

3) The tests show how unequal the school system is, and identify which schools need more help and resources because their students are falling behind. Standardized tests have been the main way educators, experts and policymakers have measured the achievement gap between low-income and minority children and their wealthier, white peers. And knowing how big the gap is has prompted more urgency in the effort to close it.

“I haven’t seen anything that suggests that we’re at a point in the opt out movement where we’re skewing the data. If it was to get real legs and we saw big groups of kids not taking the test, then I think we do have an equity issue,” Jacobs said. “The results of the tests are some of the best markers we have to help identify those equity issues.”

Which argument is more convincing? Latoshia Wheeler, for her part, was still adamant there is a better way than standardized exams.

“I don’t want to put my son through any of that to show that we need resources. You could live a day in the life of a Brownsville student and find out we need resources,” she said. “The test shows inequity in education. I agree with that. But that’s not a reason to do it.”

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn't mean it's free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.

Letters to the Editor

9 Letters

At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information. We will not consider letters that do not contain a full name and valid email address. You may submit news tips or ideas here without a full name, but not letters.

By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email address. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.

  1. As usual, Sandi Jacobs ignores reality. Its the stakes attached to test!
    Reformers are losing. they have to decide what they really want, punish teachers for defeating their test-driven theories or improve schools. This is looking like reform has degenrated into an old-fashioned vendetta.

  2. So, Jacobs argues we should continue harming children in the current testing atmosphere on the hope that they will get better? CCSS based tests don’t kick in in most places for at least another year, two in some places–and that’s not a guaranteed fix.

    By the way, anyone who needs test scores to know our school systems are unequal is simply choosing not to pay attention. Parents and teachers of the children in those schools have been pointing it out for years.

  3. i believe that god put standardized testing in the world for a reason, do not try and change that!!!!!!!!!!!

  4. As a student, I know how unreliable these tests really are. I live in Pennsylvania and I took the PSSAs throughout my whole school career. The tests here are basically memorization. I have gotten top scores for years because I memorized all the correct answers on my own and there were kids much worse than me at school doing the same thing. These tests aren’t too easy or too hard, they’re just unreliable. If you really want to see how us kids do in school then come in and visit for yourself. I would rather have security cameras and microphones in every classroom than have these tests penalize me and my teachers. If you support these standardized tests then It’s probably been way too long since you’ve taken one. if you saw some the questions on the more recent exams, you’d probably be making faces trying to understand how they reflect our kids’ skills.

  5. I think that standardized testing is a joke. All it does it cause stress on these kids. They don’t get to love life, they dread the spring, that’s not supposed to happen! I vote that we stop testing and give our kids a break!

  6. Then your selfish if you don’t get you children tested then you are a selfish low life you put other families at risk of getting COVID 19 and should not come to school

  7. You know what I find funny, how the school system will teach us how to memorize pages and pages of useless and indoctrinated information that we could look up within seconds. But they fail the teachers the most important things in life, like creativity, imagination, self-awareness, how to love other people, communication skills, challenge ideas, how to grow around food, how to build, and overall, just how to think for ourselves, or anything about money, debt or taxes. Also finding our passion and true talents in life. But no, they teach us what to think and not how to think. David Riesman’s famous quote: “The idea that men are created free and equal is both true and misleading: men are created differently; they lose their social freedom and their individual autonomy in seeking to become like each other”. The quote expresses the goal of the society is to make everybody clones into being the same. Schools and testing are one way we’re indoctrinated by the system.

Submit a letter

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *