Future of Learning

Does lunch have to be 45 minutes? Rethinking school schedules to support innovation

Getting creative with class-period lengths and staffing plans can dramatically reduce class sizes and increase teacher collaboration time

The Hechinger Report is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

Editor’s note: This story led off this week’s Future of Learning newsletter, which is delivered free to subscribers’ inboxes every Wednesday with trends and top stories about education innovation. Subscribe today!

Why do most middle schools have seven or eight periods of 45 to 60 minutes each? Why does lunch tend to last 45 minutes? In many places, it’s simply tradition.

Furman Brown, CEO and co-founder of Tegy (as in stra-tegy), is trying to get schools to rethink basic assumptions about scheduling, and in so doing, position themselves for more comprehensive educational innovations. Brown helps schools design schedules where classes end at different times and last different lengths, where midday lunch and enrichment classes give teachers in core content areas up to 100 minutes of collaboration time per day, and where team teaching can get student-to-teacher ratios as low as 10-to-one without hiring any new staff members.

Many schools want to incorporate more innovative teaching and learning methods in their schools. But scheduling isn’t a particularly common target for redesign – much to Brown’s frustration.

“It affects every moment of a teacher and learner’s educational experience, yet we don’t think about it as a thing to leverage,” he said.

One of Brown’s current projects is helping groups of elementary and middle schools in Colorado and New Jersey reconsider their school days. The work is funded by Fremont Street, a Boston-based philanthropic fund founded in 2017 to focus on supporting small- and medium-sized districts in mostly suburban and rural communities – places that don’t already get a lot of outside funding and attention for education innovation.

Letting these schools focus on time first was a strategic move on the part of Fremont Street, according to Ben Kutylo, the fund’s co-founder and president. Once educators manage to create more time for targeted student supports or teacher collaboration, the logical next step is figuring out how to best use that time.

“They naturally start to move toward thinking about new instructional strategies,” Kutylo said.

So far, he says, that’s what’s happening. Schools are using their new schedules to fit in more teacher collaboration that leads to better experiences for kids, they’re offering teachers more opportunities to observe what their colleagues are trying in the classroom, they’re adding interventions to ensure students get the supports they need, and they’re being more creative and inclusive about the ways they serve special education students because of lower class sizes.

Importantly, focusing on schedules stays away from the baggage certain fads like personalized learning have acquired. Some teachers don’t want their schools to adopt personalized learning initiatives if it means overhauling their teaching strategies without the time and support to do it well. But Kutylo has found that newfound flexibility in the school day can lay the groundwork for more support of personalized learning.

Related: OPINION: How 45-minute class periods stall learning

The Unlocking Time Project, run by education software company Abl and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (which is among The Hechinger Report’s many funders), has similar goals. Schools nationwide can go to Unlockingtime.org and find free resources to help them rethink their school schedules. There’s a survey offering school leaders a way to gather feedback about how to better use time, as well as an explainer about nine common bell schedules and examples of 17 strategies schools can tackle during the time they have. These strategies include adding a regular flex-time period to offer students more control over their learning, incorporating online learning elements into the school day, creating weeklong interdisciplinary project sessions that cross class periods and bringing more small-group instruction into the school day.

Unlocking Time launched last July and Abl has been collecting data from participating schools to produce a report later this year about how schools typically use time, how some are innovating with time and why time should be at the center of a deeper national conversation.

These resources focus on master scheduling. Tegy, by contrast, takes a step back to focus on organizational design, pushing schools to question their assumptions about learning and staffing before considering changes to the school schedule.

One key shift Brown encourages is having schools separate the schedules of teachers and students. Everyone doesn’t need the same size blocks of time for classes and lunch. That shift, Brown says, tends to open up a range of other opportunities.

Schools vary, though, in how much they take advantage of.

“A lot of schools don’t do things that are radically different,” Brown said. “They tweak in key ways.”

Some do attempt major changes. But the beauty of reconsidering time is that every school can approach it in a way that fits that school. And even small changes can be powerful.

This story about school schedules was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for our newsletters.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn't mean it's free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.
All donations doubled through the end of the year.

Join us today.

Letters

Tara García Mathewson

Tara García Mathewson is a staff writer. She launched her journalism career with two award-winning pieces co-produced during a three-month stint at the Kitsap Sun… See Archive

Letters to the Editor

Send us your thoughts

At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information.

By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.





I have taught in three states and the longest lunch period was 30 minutes, including waiting in line. Often teachers must sit and eat their lunch with their students, which can be very educational for both. I hope this planning "revelation" helps everyone, but scheduling 900 students through a cafeteria has stymied many clever time managers. Not to mention getting through the rest of the academic day.

- from Sandy, Jul 12, 2019

To the Editor of this 45 min lunch article that didn’t even talk aboutlunch except the first line or two... and claiming ‘tradition’.

My kids’ school has a 30 minute regimented lunch. Teachers walk with kids to lunchroom, where they stand in line a few mins, get lunch, sit down, eat, get up, clean up, and walk back to class. There’s no free time. There’s no time to run around and play a bit, there’s no time to just be human kids for a few mins. The teachers are there the whole time, monitoring. The teachers love using “silent lunch” as a punishment as well, becuase there’s NOTHING else to take away!

Want to be innovative? Most states require 8 hour employees to have one hour of break time every day. Half hour for lunch, and 2 fifteen minute breaks are preferable. Some lump that hour as one lunch break , where they will often extend the day a bit to make sure the employee puts in a full 8 hours. Some do not.

Now, of course, there are exceptions to rules, like, mechanics who work for dealers are very much discouraged from taking breaks, and must work work work work for 11 hours a day at their hard work job.

Kids are being treated like the mechanics an dnot like humans who need time to chill out a few times a day to be the best productive worker they can be. And Children especially because it takes a LOT of energy to just grow a human, let alone learn.

My kids get no down time. One of the teachers says to my child when he looks at his watch, cuz that teacher does NOT have a clock in her classroom to avoid kids looking at it the whole hour, “is the TIME more important than your GRADE?”

This is NOT a military school.

We were NOT created to sit in hard chairs and listen to a teacher drone all day long.

Innovation starts with remembering children are living breathing beings, not robots, who should be treated as such, so remembering to factor in relaxation and play time where the brain can STOP being crammed full, is VITAL!!!

- from Rebecca, Jul 13, 2019