NEW ORLEANS — It took 14 weeks for the Grand Jury in Ferguson to decide no charges will be filed against the officer in Michael Brown’s shooting. St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert McCulloch noted that numerous eyewitnesses gave different accounts of what happened on August 9, 2014.
But we don’t need a jury to tell us that our perceptions “can mean the difference between life and death.”
The killing of Michael Brown by Officer Darren Wilson evinces this reality.
If Michael Brown, and the other killings — of Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner, Renisha McBride and Jordan Davis — haven’t convinced you, maybe the science of the mind can.
The Perception Institute recently released The Science of Equality Volume 1: Addressing Implicit Bias, Racial Anxiety, and Stereotype Threat in Education and Health Care, a report that “details how unconscious phenomena in our minds – implicit bias, racial anxiety, and stereotype threat – impact our education and health care systems.” The Perception Institute consciously seeks to break the stalemate between our opposing racial views by deepening our understanding of our unconscious thinking.
Related: The painful backlash against ‘no-excuses’ school discipline
We literally need to learn how to change minds.
When Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon issued a state of emergency ahead of the grand jury ruling on Darren Wilson, as activists practiced their non-violent resistance tactics in anticipation of a non-indictment, it became clear that concrete political and legal resolutions are not in the immediate future.
Digging foxholes in an already militarized environment will give rise to a new generation of civil rights leaders, but that new generation will still need our support in finding root causes of racism at the unconscious level.
We need a new generation of civil rights leaders on the frontline. Ferguson is an uncomfortable place for the pampered usual suspects. Digging foxholes in an already militarized environment will give rise to a new generation of civil rights leaders, but that new generation will still need support (albeit from “safe” confines of the laboratory) in finding causes of racism at unconscious levels.
The aftermath of Ferguson also has the potential to amplify the unchanged narrative that predisposes our firmly held racialized perceptions of who and what is a threat.
But let’s be clear. Structural oppression suppresses black and brown lives. The neighborhood conditions in which poor, black and brown communities reside are taking away decades of life. Profiting from incarceration, limiting economic access to health care and restricting school funding through property taxes are the not so silent serial killers of black and brown communities. Tearing down systems requires the kind of radical responses Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. demonstrated more than 50 years ago. This is why Ferguson and new activist leadership are necessary.
And, we need to address the subconscious thoughts that help maintain these institutional barriers since MLK’s death. If our psychological walls fall, structural barriers are more likely to crumble.
So why do white people fear blacks to such a fatal degree?
Even the most ardent white Obama supporters who point to the first black President as the milestone of progress will clutch their purses when a dark, hooded stranger walks by. The Science of Equality points out that “[b]ecause of continued patterns of segregation, people are particularly likely to generalize from a single act committed by an individual member of a different race to the larger racial group to which that individual belongs.”
Our social vacuums incubate generalizations and we develop “automatic associations of stereotypes or attitudes about particular groups” – implicit bias. In mixed social situations, our racial anxieties betray us and we act differently than when we’re hanging out with our cultural relatives.
For boys of color and girls of any color, racial anxieties have a particular impact on academic tasks. The anxiety from potentially confirming a negative stereotype about her group’s academic potential degrades the performance on specific tasks. Stereotype threat reduces students’ performances on standardized tests.
It seems obvious, but the report rightly brings to surface that schools help maintain patterns of segregation. Intransigent racial demographics have been filtered through the colander of socioeconomic status. Schools are darker and poorer. The document illustrates how school settings are critical in shaping our vallances around race.
Related: Pipeline to Prison: How the juvenile justice system fails special education students
Mix re-segregated schools with the quest for closing the racial achievement gap and you have a recipe for racial anxiety and stereotype threat. Indeed, the black-white achievement gap epitomizes stereotype threat with the passively negative assumption that black should be equal to whites. (Students should reach their potentials.) Entire schools, districts and movements are infected this deficit thinking.
The Science of Equality inadvertently makes a strong case for school desegregation. With the constant efforts to carve out new high-income school districts and/or charter schools, it seems as if we’ve given up on the quest to desegregate schools. But add psychotherapy to the benefits of diversity. Diverse faculties and students disrupt the fertile ground for racial anxiety.
The Science of Equality also gives attention to disparities in suspension and expulsion data that do not reflect suspension-worth behaviors by black and Latino youth. In addition, the report highlights the biases associated with underestimating the ability of members of stereotyped groups. The study elucidates how white teachers often provide less critical feedback to students of color for fear the teacher may be perceived as bigoted. All the aforementioned behaviors stem from implicit bias and/or racial anxiety.
The good news is the report offers empirically based interventions that can alleviate implicit bias, racial anxiety and stereotype threat. Unfortunately, these interventions won’t bring justice for Michael Brown, or hundreds others who have died in anonymity.
We must implement a long-range strategy to honor those who’ve been killed in the blink of an eye and those who are lost through measured discrimination.
Andre Perry, founding dean of urban education at Davenport University in Grand Rapids, Mich., is the author of The Garden Path: The Miseducation of a City (2011).
This story was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news website focused on inequality and innovation in education. Read more columns by Andre Perry.
We are so deeply in denial about the damage that schools do. Change is impossible because failure breeds growth of the system. And the bigger the school system grows, the more we let it intrude into the task of raising children.
Segregation by race and income is accompanied by unequal resource allocation in the schools. For example, according to 2004 NEA stats, about 2/3s of teachers with less than 3 years experience were assigned to schools where African American and Puerto Rican students were over-represented. In such schools, it is common for a majority of new teachers to be fired and replaced before they finish their 3 year probationary period. African American teachers are most heavily assigned to those schools, helping to explain the declining number of African American teachers in the public school system since the 1970s. The Obama Administration has acknowledge that inequitable resource is a problem, but is pushing remedies that will only serve to intensify and intrench the inequality, e.g., promotion of charter schools and elimination of teacher job protections on the premise that seniority, tenure, and due process rights (and public schools) are huge obstacles to equitable resource allocation. How it is that New Orleans, which is totally charterized, and a number of state where teachers unions are outlawed, are not closing the resource allocation gaps? The Obama administration is pushing a labor relations agenda masquerading as a Civil Rights agenda. Bill Gates and the Koch brothers are posing as Civil Rights leaders, the Heritage Foundation, Bradley Foundation, ALEC, etc. as Civil Rights organizations. Why not straight forward steps to equalize resource allocation, including increasing teacher retention, increasing support for teachers in high poverty schools, and not firing them en masse? Why not compel school district to desegregate, for good measure? If the Obama administration is really a Civil Right champion, why the president not pushing for serious enforcement of laws against racial discrimination against covert discrimination in employment, housing, insurance, lending, etc. Why not renew the “war on poverty”?