The Hechinger Report is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

Spending on state-funded preschool dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the 2011-12 school year compared to the year before, creating a hole that some states are only now attempting to fill, according to a report out today from the State of Preschool 2012 produced by the National Institute for Early Education Research, based at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J.

NIEER said the cuts were due, in part, to lingering effects of the budget woes in the states caused by the recent recession, plus the expiration of federal economic-stimulus funds. State funding for preschool stood at $3,481 per child in the 2011-12 school year, down from $5,020 in 2001-02.

W. Steven Barnett, the NIEER director, said that some states, such as Michigan, proposed in this year’s legislative session to make increases in early-childhood spending, and others were planning programs where none had existed before, like Mississippi. (Both states’ plans were explored in a recent Education Week article.) But the NIEER data tracks actual expenditures, not just promises to spend more money, he added.

“It’s one thing to promise an increase, but it’s another thing to actually follow through,” Barnett said. Michigan’s proposal is currently under consideration in both the state House and Senate; Mississippi approved spending $3 million for a limited preschool program to serve about 1,300 children, the first time the state has spent money on preschool.

The report tracked the decrease in early-childhood spending and enrollment based on several measures. Among its conclusions:

  • State funding per child for pre-K declined in 27 of 40 states with programs, when adjusted for inflation. In 13 states, per-child spending fell by 10 percent or more from the previous year. Only 12 states increased funding per child in 2011-2012.
  • Only 15 states plus the District of Columbia could be verified as providing enough per-child funding to meet all 10 benchmarks for quality standards. As only about 20 percent of the children enrolled in state-funded pre-K attend those programs, the vast majority of children served are in programs where funding per child may be inadequate to provide a quality education.
  • More than 1.3 million children attended state-funded pre-K, 1.1 million at age 4. That reflects an enrollment increase of fewer than 10,000 children from the previous year, which was not enough to offset population growth and increase the percentage of children served. Four percent of 3-year-olds and 28 percent of 4-year-olds were served in state-funded pre-K, the same as in the previous year.
  • Combining general and special education enrollments, 31 percent of 4-year-olds and 7 percent of 3-year-olds are served by public pre-K. When Head Start programs are included, 41 percent of 4-year-olds and 14 percent of 3-year-olds are served in these publicly funded programs. These percentages are similar to last year, indicating that enrollment in publicly-funded programs more generally has stagnated.

NIEER’s ten quality benchmarks include items such as whether teachers have bachelor’s degrees, whether they receive 15 hours or more of in-service training, and whether class sizes are 20 students or lower. Four states and one of the three programs available in Louisiana meet the benchmarks, down from five states in the previous year.

The Obama administration’s proposal to increase federal investment in preschool by partnering with states seems “tailor-made” to fix some of the deficiencies identified in the report, Barnett said. That proposal would use cigarette-tax money to provide $75 billion over the next 10 years in increased spending on 4-year-olds from low- and moderate-income families. The money would primarily come from the federal government in the first years, but eventually taper off until states are funding most of the effort on their own—something leaders should already want to do, Barnett said.

“All 50 states should support a state-funded preschool program of high quality,” he said.

This story appears courtesy Education Week. Reproduction is not permitted.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn't mean it's free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.

Letters to the Editor

1 Letter

At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information. We will not consider letters that do not contain a full name and valid email address. You may submit news tips or ideas here without a full name, but not letters.

By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email address. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.

  1. Just don’t use the California First 5 programs as the model for anything national.

    Visit FLOPPED5, an independent and uncompensated watchdog site on the First 5 Commissions

    They have recently admitted that $300M was transferred from the program to illegally fund state programs. Also, 20 resignations for bad behavior should have you all going, what the?

    Be informed, Learn more, our kids deserve better than the FAIL that is First 5.

Submit a letter

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *