America’s primary and secondary schools may be busy preparing for the onset of the Common Core standards, meant to better prepare students for college, but one key partner isn’t even close to ready: colleges and universities themselves.
That’s the conclusion of a new report from the New America Foundation, which finds that “there is little evidence to suggest colleges are meaningfully aligning college instruction and teacher preparation programs with the Common Core standards.”
Even though the Common Core was meant largely to improve the college readiness of high school graduates, the report says, “Many of those within higher education were not involved in developing or endorsing the Common Core standards and assessments, and have not considered how they might change their own practices to align with this K–12 initiative. Indeed, many are not even aware of the Common Core.”
The findings follow earlier alarms that the people who run higher education have, for the most part, gotten involved only late in the Common Core process.
Forty-three states and the District of Columbia have adopted the Common Core, a set of standards meant to help improve the preparation of students from primary and secondary schools to go on to—and succeed in—college.
But “there are few coherent approaches being used to join these two systems into a rational shared commitment to the Common Core,” the report found.
“Many [in higher education] are not even aware of the Common Core.” – New America Foundation report
One reason, it said, is that it’s hard to come up with a single definition of what makes a student ready for college. Another is the huge variety of colleges and universities. Yet another is that “there is little or no pressure on colleges and universities to change their own academic practices to align with or incorporate these new standards … even among educators who are genuinely invested in making these new standards and assessments work at the K–12 level.
The report recommends that colleges add the results of Common Core assessment tests to the measures by which they gauge students’ eligibility for admission and financial aid; that they help make sure primary and secondary schools teach the things needed to succeed in higher education, and that the Common Core tests measure them; and that schools of education show future teachers how to prepare their students for college and careers.
Related stories
Only a quarter of high school students who took the ACT test last year were judged ready for college in English, reading, math, and science, according to the company that administers the test. Another national study found that more than half of recent high-school graduates entering community colleges needed remedial courses, a process so demoralizing that only about a quarter of them ever manage to earn degrees.
Providing all of that remedial education costs universities and colleges $7 billion a year, the National Bureau of Economic Research reports.
Not all of higher education is behind. Colleges and universities in Tennessee, California, and some other states are working with their K-12 counterparts to get ready for the Common Core, and more than 200 college and university leaders last month announced a new group to support the Common Core, called Higher Ed for Higher Standards.
Yet a separate survey by the Center on Education Policy at George Washington University found that education commissioners in 35 of the states that have signed onto the Common Core report major or minor challenges in working with higher-education institutions on the transition to the new standards.
If Common Core really intends to better prepare kids for college (which it won’t), then why would colleges need to change? Why would a college need to prepare for CC? It makes no sense. Unless of course Common Core isn’t what it is billed to be. Where again is the evidence to back up this claim of better preparing students for college? Oh right! In their marketing talking points… Which totally makes it true.
I actually think it makes sense – if teachers are expected to teach common core, then education degree programs should prepare their teaching students for it. And I definitely think college/university teachers and admin should have a say in what makes a student prepared for college! Kind of disturbing that this second piece is only happening now… Would be interested to hear the perspective of those working on campuses now.
Keep in mind that the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation contributes well over one million dollars to the New America Foundation and the Gates foundation has contributed millions of dollars to Common Core development and implementation so I doubt this article is much more than a paid advertisement.
The Hechinger Report is an independent news organization. The stories you read here are produced by our team of experienced journalists, who take very seriously our watchdog role. We ask tough questions and challenge the status quo in education, and we prize our independence. Our funders know that any attempt to influence our stories would jeopardize the work we do and lead us to seek support elsewhere.
We welcome questions from the public about how we do our work, and strive to be transparent to our audience. Here’s a link to our current funders: https://hechingerreport.org/supporters/
Higher education should absolutely not change one iota to accommodate common core in any way, shape or form. As CWhite noted, if common core lacks external validity, that’s wholly on the shoulders of those standards. Asking them to change would be like asking a scientist to change their experimental results to fit a theory – in a word, backwards.
I don’t intend to debate the validity of the common core here? However, I’m perplexed by this article. Is the problem ED schools aren’t preparing educators to teach common core standards or is the issue higher ed across the board isn’t shifting to accommodate students who were taught based on the common core. If the latter, there is a huge flaw in the thesis. CCSS were said to be created to better prepare students for college. Why in the world would higher need to know about or make any adjustments whatsoever to connect to K12 curriculum? Doesn’t that defeat the basic premise of why CCSS were created? Am I missing something?