Get important education news and analysis delivered straight to your inbox
A landmark Colorado law that ties teacher evaluations to the progress of their students on achievement tests could help build momentum for a national movement that seeks to overhaul how instructors’ tenure and pay is earned, education leaders say.
Colorado’s law will hold teachers accountable for whether their students are learning, with 50% of a teacher’s evaluation based on students’ academic growth as measured partially by test scores. In California, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is pushing legislation that will change the way teachers are evaluated, but its prospects are less certain; the state’s teachers union strongly opposes it.
Colorado’s action comes amid a national debate over how to get the best teachers into the classroom and remove the ones who aren’t doing a good job.
Similar legislation emphasizing teacher performance over job security is pending in Louisiana and Minnesota, and bills overhauling tenure protections and/or evaluation systems have already passed in Maryland, Connecticut, Washington, Tennessee and Michigan.
Where are teacher effectiveness changes taking place?
Green: Changes approved Yellow: Change proposed Red: Change rejected
“It’s impossible to overstate just how significant this [Colorado] bill is,” said Tim Daly, president of the New Teacher Project, a national nonprofit that released a report last year revealing how the vast majority of teacher evaluation systems fail to distinguish effective teachers from ineffective ones. “The bill is remarkable both in its content and its comprehensiveness. I think there is a good reason to believe that [more] change is coming.”
Under Colorado’s law, passed with bipartisan support and signed by Gov. Bill Ritter Jr. on Thursday, even tenured teachers who are found to be “ineffective” for two consecutive years could lose job protections, and possibly their jobs.
Colorado’s law also reflects a wholesale change in attitudes toward evaluating teachers. Like many states, Colorado is hoping to bolster its chances in the Race to the Top grant competition before second-round applications are due June 1. The program rewards states for assessing teacher effectiveness, and Colorado has $175 million at stake.
Democratic State Sen. Mike Johnston, a former school principal who is deeply involved with education reform issues, sponsored Colorado’s bill, which passed the House 36-29 and was approved several hours later by the Senate with a 27-8 vote.
READ OUR Q&A WITH JOHNSTON ON TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
Approval in Colorado is a promising sign, said Bonnie Reiss, California’s secretary of education: “Every time our state Legislature sees another state taking leadership in this important reform area, it does increase our likelihood” of passing the bill.
Support from Democrats and, at the last minute, from a teachers union in Colorado represents a major political shift at a time when states are facing huge budget cuts that could mean thousands of teacher layoffs.
The teacher’s union is vehemently opposed to the bill introduced by state Sen. Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar) and approved by the Senate Education Committee in April. Union leaders, who are paying for television ads urging opposition, argue that it would gut due-process rights and scapegoat teachers during bad economic times. “Rather than focusing on the real problems facing our schools, like larger class sizes and cuts to student programs, this bill simply blames teachers,” the California Teachers Assn. said in a statement.
Supporters argue that performance should dictate personnel decisions. The bill would allow schools to lay off, assign, transfer and rehire teachers and administrators based on effectiveness and subject-matter needs — a radical departure from the current seniority-based policy.
Schwarzenegger is hopeful that California’s legislators will come together and support the bill, which he believes would bring better teachers to schools that most need them, said Andrea McCarthy, a deputy press secretary. “The single most important factor to student achievement is having a great teacher in the classroom.”
The governor’s push for the bill comes as the cash-strapped state is also making a second attempt to win Race to the Top dollars. In the hopes of making the state more competitive, Reiss has sent a letter urging all county and district superintendents as well as charter school administrators to adopt specific reforms, including linking teacher evaluation to student growth; the unions are urging local affiliates not to sign on.
President Obama and U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan are actively encouraging teacher evaluation and tenure reform by tying them to federal funds, another sign of the changing politics of education reform.
In Colorado, the law attracted national attention in part because it bucked a trend of Republicans leading statewide efforts to implement merit pay and tenure reform. Democrats have largely sided with unions in opposition to these changes.
“It may be the first time ever that Democrats pushed an agenda that opposed the agenda of the teachers unions,” said Kate Walsh, president of the National Council on Teacher Quality.
And although teachers unions opposed the legislation in Colorado, the state chapter of the American Federation of Teachers, in an unexpected twist, endorsed it after securing several amendments that both the AFT and the Colorado Education Assn., an affiliate of the National Education Assn., had pushed.
“I truly believe that we need to be leaders in education reform,” said Brenda Smith, president of AFT Colorado.
The NEA, the nation’s largest teachers union, remains opposed, although Colorado Education Association President Beverly Ingle called it “much improved from the initial bill.”
Teacher tenure legislation has proven challenging nationally. Florida Republican Governor Charlie Crist vetoed a teacher reform bill that would have enacted performance pay and eliminated tenure after he was besieged by opposition.
Delaware, one of only two states to receive money in the first round of the Race to the Top competition, has already revamped its teacher evaluation systems. New York and New Jersey have announced plans to do the same.
All of the teacher effectiveness bills vary in how far they go. For example, in Illinois, which finished fifth in the first round of Race to the Top competition, legislators have been criticized for not changing state law that allows seniority to prevail in teacher layoffs.
Colorado’s passage of the bill provided weeks of political drama and compromise. Van Schoales, executive director of the Education Reform Now, called the bill’s politics the most contentious he’s seen in the state. He described watching Democratic Rep. Mark Ferrandino break into tears while recounting his decision to support the bill. “I’ve never seen a legislator sob like this,” Schoales said.
Mike Miles, superintendent of the Harrison school district in Colorado Springs, was less focused on the politics. He wondered why it took so long to have tough conversations about rating teachers and principals on the academic growth of their students.
“It suggests to me, that we needed, as a profession, people to put some stakes in the ground and say look, here is the mark, now let’s talk about how we get there.”
Eliza Krigman is a staff reporter at the National Journal based in Washington, DC. For the past year, she has written extensively on federal education issues and moderated an expert education blog. A version of this story appeared here in the Los Angeles Times on May 23, 2010.
At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information. We will not consider letters that do not contain a full name and valid email address. You may submit news tips or ideas here without a full name, but not letters.
By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email address. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.
The problem in Colorado is this:
Students and parents suffer no consequences when students score poorly on these 12 – 16 hour tests. Thus, the students and parents seldom take them seriously. If teachers’ jobs hang in the balance here, it is only fitting that the students’ promotions also hang in the balance. This procedure is all ready in place in other states. No pass, no promote. Also, students should have to pass a readiness exam before admittance to kindergarten. If they are behind, they should have to take a pre-kindergarten remedial class before they can be enrolled.
It is interesting that these measures are being promoted by a state that is in the top 15 in wealth and the bottom ten in state funding for education. The legislators had a chance to take a stand on this inequity and voted it down during the same session in which they cut another 260 million from funding and passed this bill. Do I smell scapegoat here? If you want to know what it is like to teach in Colorado, check out the bottom states in the country. Alabama funds its schools better. This state needs to provide its students and teachers with equitable working and learning conditions before it starts bragging about this bill.
I have been teaching for over 30 years in 6 different states and overseas. This new trend to base teachers salary and even their employment on student test scores is stupidity at it’s finest. Thank goodness Governor Christ of Florida vetoed our bill.
The answer is very easy. Base teacher’s futures on teacher’s test results. Every state should fully fund National Boards for Professional Teachers (NBPT), and mandate that passing this rigorous process at year 5 is required to maintain a teaching certificate. A teacher must go well beyond contractual requirements to pass. Ineffective, lazy teachers will be weeded out within a few years. Everyone who has passed the NBPT became even more effective and a highly professional teachers.
Florida recently stopped fully funding NBPT and it is a mistake. Many of our National Board teachers are working hard to turn this decision around.
“The single most important factor to student achievement is having a great teacher in the classroom.” TOO TRUE!!! I am an educator and my students love the learning process because it is relative to their lives and assessment is varied based on individual motivation. In addition, my son is in third grade, he has loved school because he said that he had teachers who cared and made it fun to learn. This year he hates school, literally, and from what i’ve seen in terms of assignments, class assessment, structure, and lack of teacher creativity and general care… I don’t blame him. We are counting down the days he has left with this teacher who has obviously lost the passion to teach.
To link teacher quality to scores on high-stakes tests is problematic (check out http://www.fairtest.org). These tests are but a snapshot of factual information (with a verbal-linguistic focus) of one day in the life of a child. We must allow well-documented alternative assessments (my preference is video documentation of student performance) into the “mix” before we can determine effectiveness of the teacher. Many ELL students who can demonstrate a science concept with manipulatives, for instance, may be the same students who fail the standardized test for Science. Did the teacher fail, or was it the method of assessing these students? Let’s give this some careful, systemic thought to this issue before losing huge numbers of teachers to a far too simplistic measure of their competency.
It’s funny that throughout all my education, all the research suggests that you cannot base a child’s knowledge based on one standardized test. Yet this is what the bigwigs suggest we base student progress on, as well as if the teacher has done her job. All I see is that most teachers will be clamoring to get out of the neediest schools and the testing grades. Great job Arnie. It’s not so difficult to see the trend.
I am totally for this bill and am glad I live in a state that has passed it. In ANY other profession or business, if you don’t satisfy your customers or clientele or provide an equitable service, you get FIRED or go out of business. It has been way too easy over the years to blame a child’s lack of achievement on the child. “He’s not applying himself”, “She is being lazy”, “Your child could do much better if he put forth more effort”. TOO easy to blame the child. And what is a parent to do, the burden of proof is on them to prove incompetance on the part of the teacher. I’m tired of teachers who don’t care. Who got into the profession and then realized it wasn’t what they thought, or who have been in it too long and have lost their passion to teach. These type of teachers need to be weeded out, for the sake of our children. Performance for pay! Not a novel concept.
All right! Students rule! Hey students and parents out there in electronic world, we can now get all of the teachers fired. I’m calling on all students to intentionally fail this test. We can then fire all the teachers and end public education. Hey you won’t have to do any work any more, because students rule! Let’s bring on the chaos and anarchy. Let’s party on the destruction of public education. I feel the wall crumbling. We won’t be another brick in the wall. We can be who we truly are which is a bunch of illiterates.
Submit a letter